DevSecOps & Security · Example engagement

Shift-left security for a regulated fintech release pipeline

Payments company · audit-driven · manual security reviews

Security reviews happened at the end of each release, findings arrived late and audit evidence was rebuilt by hand every quarter.

PipelineCommitBuildSASTSCADeployRun logPolicy gatesTests passNo critical findingsApproved change

The challenge

Where things stood.

  • Manual review gates delayed releases by days.
  • Long-lived cloud keys stored in CI variables.
  • SOC 2 evidence collected from screenshots and spreadsheets.

Our approach

How we would solve it.

  1. 01

    Map the delivery path

    Trace every route from commit to production and agree which risks each gate must catch.

  2. 02

    Automate the gates

    SAST in pull requests, dependency scanning with SBOMs, container image scanning and policy-as-code checks.

  3. 03

    Remove standing secrets

    Pipeline OIDC and short-lived workload identity replace stored cloud keys.

  4. 04

    Make evidence continuous

    Controls produce reviewable evidence automatically as part of every release.

Deliverables

What the client receives.

Services involved:

  • Secure pipeline architecture and gate policy
  • Scanner integration with an owned findings register
  • OIDC-based deployment identity
  • Control-to-evidence map for audit

Outcomes

What success looks like.

  • Findings appear in the pull request, not after release
  • No long-lived cloud credentials in CI
  • Audit evidence is generated, not assembled
  • Release cadence is set by the team, not by review queues

Example engagement: an illustrative scenario showing how DotConn approaches this kind of work. Client details and figures are not shown.