The situation
A customer asks whether a named vulnerable library is in a deployed release.
Dependency analysis identifies the external components used by software. A software bill of materials records that composition so teams can investigate exposure and respond when component risks change.
Is this right for you?
You cannot reliably identify which releases contain a vulnerable component or provide a component inventory to a customer.
The first conversation establishes the environment, the constraint and who will accept the result. We agree a bounded starting point before expanding the engagement.
Scope
Review package manifests, lockfiles, build artifacts and transitive dependencies.
Produce an SBOM in an agreed machine-readable format and tie it to a release.
Define vulnerability triage, update ownership and the response when a relevant advisory appears.
Deliverables
Acceptance criteria identify the checks, records and handover needed for the agreed scope.
In practice
The situation
A customer asks whether a named vulnerable library is in a deployed release.
Our approach
We establish a release-linked inventory and a process for checking exposure and updating affected components.
The useful result
The team can answer from a maintained record rather than reconstruct the build manually.
Responsibility
Assesses and delivers the technical work in the agreed scope, with reviewable changes and handover. Continuing operation requires a separately defined managed-service scope.
Provides authorized access, business priorities and accountable decision-makers; approves policy choices and accepts the agreed result.
An SBOM is an inventory, not a security guarantee. Completeness, generation context and ongoing analysis must be agreed.
FAQ
Technical reading
Scanning identifies findings at a point in time. A release-linked inventory supports later investigation and traceability; the two serve related but different needs.
Pricing, timing and how to prepare are covered in working with DotConn.
Connected work
Container security work reviews the software and configuration packaged in an image, alongside how that image is built and promoted into use.
ExploreSAST analyzes application source or compiled code for potential security weaknesses without exercising the running service. Its value depends on language coverage, rule quality and useful feedback to developers.
ExploreAudit-readiness engineering turns agreed control requirements into implemented technical measures and reviewable evidence. It helps teams explain how a control operates and who is responsible for it.
ExploreApplication security combines complementary checks of source code, dependencies, containers and running behavior. The goal is an actionable view of risk and a way to verify remediation.
Explore